Which ones should be the standards of neutrality and quality in Wikipedia? The general introduction for visitors states the following:

“As wiki documents, articles are never considered complete and may be continually edited and improved. Over time, this generally results in an upward trend of quality and a growing consensus over a neutral representation of information.”

But “generally” does not mean “always”. This is crystal clear when any neutral, informed observer goes to the Spanish version of Wikipedia and reads the shameful article on the Spanish nation (Nación española). I have just picked up four simple examples from the text, but a good dozen of them could be found. Let’s have a look: Continue reading →